Liberals’ Silly Contortions over Premium Support
Earlier this week the Center for American Progress released a paper, and former Obama Administration official Zeke Emanuel wrote a blog post, attacking the Ryan-Wyden premium support model. The gist of both documents is their assertion that government-run Medicare would attract sicker beneficiaries than private plans, and in so doing fatally undermine the government-run program. From the CAP report:
No version of premium support fully prevents private health insurance plans from attracting healthier beneficiaries, driving up premiums for those who remain in traditional Medicare. In addition, no version of premium support creates a level playing field between private plans and traditional Medicare. As a result of these two factors, more and more beneficiaries would gradually shift to private plans over time.
Compare the above position to the (in)famous quote from a Congressional Democrat two years ago, in which she said that a government-run plan for those under age 65 would eradicate private insurance:
Next to me was a guy from the insurance company, who then argued against the public health insurance option, saying it wouldn’t let private insurance compete – that a public option will put the private insurance industry out of business and lead to single payer [loud cheering]. My single payer friends: He was right. The man was right.
So the liberal groups who once claimed that a government-run plan “will put the private insurance industry out of business and lead to single payer” NOW believe that government-run Medicare CANNOT compete on a “level playing field” against the private sector. Why didn’t they tell us this two years ago…?
There are three possible explanations for this abrupt U-turn by the left:
- Liberals believe that risk adjustment to adjust for beneficiaries’ health status will not work effectively, and that allowing plans to offer benefits actuarially equivalent to, but not exact replicas of, government-run Medicare will attract healthier beneficiaries. In this case, the left is admitting Obamacare will fail – because Obamacare includes provisions allowing for actuarially equivalent plans (Section 1302(d)) and a risk adjustment program (Section 1343).
- Liberals believe that unlike the above-65 population in Medicare, everyone below age 65 has identical health status, rendering concerns about certain plans attracting sicker-than-average beneficiaries moot.
- Liberals will say one thing when it comes to expanding government control, and another when it comes to giving individuals more private choices.
Feel free to decide amongst yourselves which option you find most accurate…